Building a DevOps Pipeline Reviews

Wescley M. · Reviewed около 1 месяца ago

The second step doesn't works

José A. · Reviewed около 1 месяца ago

Sean H. · Reviewed около 1 месяца ago

Brunno E. · Reviewed около 1 месяца ago

BALAGURUMOORHY S. · Reviewed около 1 месяца ago

The instance was created with the required parameters, and the text “Hello DevOps Fans.” is displayed as expected. The remaining steps in the lab were completed and validated without any issues.

Ivan B. · Reviewed около 1 месяца ago

TAI JI J. · Reviewed около 1 месяца ago

Thanks for fix the lab

Edgar Y. · Reviewed около 1 месяца ago

Brunno E. · Reviewed около 1 месяца ago

lab was OK, except from "check my progress" for the 1st checkpoint not working. the service worked as expected, but "progress check" did not see the VM UPDATE => retaking the lab, I could see it was recently updated; the issue with "check progress" got fixed; it's great to see that feedback results in improvements!

Jakub G. · Reviewed около 1 месяца ago

Kirankumar B. · Reviewed около 1 месяца ago

Mohammad Sadegh K. · Reviewed около 1 месяца ago

Instructions could be more comprehensive

Bjorn G. · Reviewed около 1 месяца ago

Fabiana B. · Reviewed около 1 месяца ago

Stefan E. · Reviewed около 1 месяца ago

zzz

arun v. · Reviewed около 1 месяца ago

Step 4 check fails even though I have done everything as per lab instructions!!!! The lab instructions are probably out-of-date wrt the check up script...

Oskari R. · Reviewed около 1 месяца ago

SUDHIR T. · Reviewed около 1 месяца ago

Kantz T. · Reviewed около 1 месяца ago

The lab does not work - external IP addresses do not respond to requests.

Ernst K. · Reviewed около 1 месяца ago

Validation doesnt work. Seems like a known problem. Hour of life wasted: https://discuss.google.dev/t/problems-validating-building-a-devops-pipeline-lab-in-the-reliable-google-cloud-infrastructure-design-and-process-course/255998

Moritz H. · Reviewed около 1 месяца ago

not good

Bitthal P. · Reviewed около 1 месяца ago

Instructions could be more comprehensive

Bjorn G. · Reviewed около 1 месяца ago

not good

Bitthal P. · Reviewed около 1 месяца ago

Yugal M. · Reviewed около 1 месяца ago