ML on GCP [v1.0] - C4 - Improving model accuracy with new features Reviews
1373 reviews
Could ask for estimation differences given changes in data. How including a new feature or adjusting its rang affects the model.
Julio M. · Reviewed almost 8 years ago
Average level. Not google level lab.
Jitender S. · Reviewed almost 8 years ago
Could ask for estimation differences given changes in data. How including a new feature or adjusting its rang affects the model.
Julio M. · Reviewed almost 8 years ago
Azadeh A. · Reviewed almost 8 years ago
Javier P. · Reviewed almost 8 years ago
Christian N. · Reviewed almost 8 years ago
Cabot N. · Reviewed almost 8 years ago
吳品曄 吳. · Reviewed almost 8 years ago
Some explanation of output would have been useful including comparison to loss found on earlier models.
Jon B. · Reviewed almost 8 years ago
Jiaming K. · Reviewed almost 8 years ago
Jeff L. · Reviewed almost 8 years ago
Min L. · Reviewed almost 8 years ago
Daniel F. · Reviewed almost 8 years ago
LTI S. · Reviewed almost 8 years ago
Enrique P. · Reviewed almost 8 years ago
Jamieson S. · Reviewed almost 8 years ago
Matt F. · Reviewed almost 8 years ago
Mario Y. · Reviewed almost 8 years ago
Ezra E. · Reviewed almost 8 years ago
I would have enjoyed a prediction. But I'm sort of getting used to having the summary during the following lab solution. Looks like average loss for eval data is a reasonalbe measure of relative training effectiveness for different features.
Charlie M. · Reviewed almost 8 years ago
I would have enjoyed a summary. But I'm sort of getting used to having the sumary during the following lab solution.
Charlie M. · Reviewed almost 8 years ago
Michael B. · Reviewed almost 8 years ago
Artan R. · Reviewed almost 8 years ago
LEE S. · Reviewed almost 8 years ago
Jeffrey S. · Reviewed almost 8 years ago
We do not ensure the published reviews originate from consumers who have purchased or used the products. Reviews are not verified by Google.