[DEPRECATED] AHYBRID041 Observing Anthos Services recensioni
5822 recensioni
Valeriy C. · Recensione inserita circa 2 anni fa
The entire lab seems half broken. The SLO is full of permission errors, some interfaces don't have anything that matches the descriptions written, the asmcli command hanged twice, traces were not being exported, the demo app was slow at all times (not just after the canary deployment), etc. Overall, the entire thing needs to be revisited.
Angelo B. · Recensione inserita circa 2 anni fa
subhasis m. · Recensione inserita circa 2 anni fa
Abhaya M. · Recensione inserita circa 2 anni fa
good one
sumit k. · Recensione inserita circa 2 anni fa
Ritesh J. · Recensione inserita circa 2 anni fa
Abbasali S. · Recensione inserita circa 2 anni fa
Abbasali S. · Recensione inserita circa 2 anni fa
Manoj J. · Recensione inserita circa 2 anni fa
Ismael U. · Recensione inserita circa 2 anni fa
Ismael U. · Recensione inserita circa 2 anni fa
This lab needs a fix and some basic proofreading. It is annoying that you provide such low-quality content. 1. loadgenerator doesn't start. This breaks the lab beginning with Task 6. ``` $ kubectl get deployments/loadgenerator NAME READY UP-TO-DATE AVAILABLE AGE loadgenerator 0/1 1 0 15m ``` ``` $ kubectl logs deployments/loadgenerator Error from server (BadRequest): container "main" in pod "loadgenerator-66c47bdc74-7j2mg" is waiting to start: PodInitializing ``` ``` $ kubectl describe pod/loadgenerator-66c47bdc74-7j2mg Events: Type Reason Age From Message ---- ------ ---- ---- ------- Normal Scheduled 16m default-scheduler Successfully assigned default/loadgenerator-66c47bdc74-7j2mg to gke-gke-pool-12345-5d62d571-7883 Normal Pulling 16m kubelet Pulling image "gcr.io/gke-release/asm/proxyv2:1.18.7-asm.4" Normal Pulled 16m kubelet Successfully pulled image "gcr.io/gke-release/asm/proxyv2:1.18.7-asm.4" in 6.36s (6.36s including waiting) Normal Created 16m kubelet Created container istio-validation Normal Started 16m kubelet Started container istio-validation Normal Pulled 16m kubelet Successfully pulled image "busybox:latest" in 983ms (983ms including waiting) Normal Pulled 14m kubelet Successfully pulled image "busybox:latest" in 329ms (329ms including waiting) Normal Pulled 11m kubelet Successfully pulled image "busybox:latest" in 162ms (162ms including waiting) Normal Pulling 9m25s (x4 over 16m) kubelet Pulling image "busybox:latest" Normal Pulled 9m25s kubelet Successfully pulled image "busybox:latest" in 165ms (165ms including waiting) Normal Created 9m24s (x4 over 16m) kubelet Created container frontend-check Normal Started 9m24s (x4 over 16m) kubelet Started container frontend-check Warning BackOff 62s (x15 over 12m) kubelet Back-off restarting failed container frontend-check in pod loadgenerator-66c47bdc74-7j2mg_default(ffb5ce3e-d24a-4461-98c8-2dbd770bd424) ``` 2. `kubectl get configmap` should be `kubectl get configmap -n istio-system` The respective `Output:` section below should be updated accordingly as well. Probably smth like: `kubectl get configmap istio-asm-managed -n istio-system -o yaml`. 3. The instruction "Return to the Workloads and Services & Ingress pages..." doesn't make sense, as there's no instruction to go there preceding it. 4. The instruction "to do one of the following" in #6 of the "Install the Online Boutique application on the GKE cluster" makes no sense, as the only activity proposed is "Look on the Services & Ingress page within the console." 5. Lastly, in "Set Latency Threshold to 1000" unit is missing. 1000 what?
Maciej S. · Recensione inserita circa 2 anni fa
sasank k. · Recensione inserita circa 2 anni fa
Aleksandra G. · Recensione inserita circa 2 anni fa
Denys F. · Recensione inserita circa 2 anni fa
Emmanuel S. · Recensione inserita circa 2 anni fa
Jose E. · Recensione inserita circa 2 anni fa
Ross S. · Recensione inserita circa 2 anni fa
Charuhas K. · Recensione inserita circa 2 anni fa
Sasa P. · Recensione inserita circa 2 anni fa
Sarita R. · Recensione inserita circa 2 anni fa
Shubhachandra H. · Recensione inserita circa 2 anni fa
Abhay C. · Recensione inserita circa 2 anni fa
Rafael L. · Recensione inserita circa 2 anni fa
Horrible! Instructions very hard to follow, no match between descriptions and cloud screens. No counter available to check the progress!
Marius A. · Recensione inserita circa 2 anni fa
Non garantiamo che le recensioni pubblicate provengano da consumatori che hanno acquistato o utilizzato i prodotti. Le recensioni non sono verificate da Google.